This seems to be a big promise by a lot of candidates this election. Let’s face the facts in the past 10 years this city’s spending has ballooned from about 90 million to 135 million.
It is time to reconsider what services that city should offer. To have a reasonable tax rate this city needs to reduce its spending very drastically. In most accounts, the number that results in a reasonable tax rate is about $105 million dollars.
Our fire service is one of the most costly in the country. Our transit services have increased in municipal funding from $250,000 to over $5 million dollars in the past 10 years. In addition, the biggest sources of revenue (the parking commission) and the biggest expenses (major facilities, pension fund, solid waste) are not under the city’s complete control and are hidden behind provincial legislation.
These bodies are also not required to be either open or accountable to the public. Several years ago the spring garbage collection was removed for costing half a million dollars in one week, but was it really required?
A truly responsible new council should take the necessary measures to remove Saint John from the ranks of the highest property taxes and water taxes in the country and instead promote measures to increase the tax base but offering a more advantageous tax rate to attack further development.
It is now 7pm in the council chambers and the councillors are now arriving. As council begins there is 44 people here.
The meeting has now begun the councillor are doing their opening thanks to different community groups.
Joe Mott is absent tonight. Most of the routine business is quite boring and routine. The first item is 12.1 on the demolition of a dilapidated building on city road no one will miss. Next is a review of the Taxi by-law review and a full presentation with slides.
Council has after an hour approved starting the process of drafting the new Taxi By-Law something that has been talked about for close to 15 years now. Now they are discussing changes to the procurement policies.
Now it is time for transit (11.2). Councillor Higgins has moved to reassess the decision to cuts. Now the motion is a refer to budget deliberations. Councillor Farren sounds hesitant as long as it does not increase taxes. Deputy Mayor Chase does not seem to really support this. He is even denying that Higgins did know that the facts that she is denying and is stern on holding the budget. Councillor Norton is proposing a public review on route changes, but is being cautious. Councillor Snook is supporting transit but is supportive of the public consultation of optimizing routes. The City Manager is trying to educate council that this is not a cut but a limit to the increase to 1% even though Transit has been increasing the city’s subsidy by about 8%. Court was not favourable to the motion. Councillor Sullivan is not wavering on the fact that Transit is not a council priority. They are trying to wash their hands of transit and placing responsibility on the commission and the province for the taxes on the garage.
Some appear on delaying a decision. Councillor Titus, the council representative on the Transit Commission, is placing the blame back on council. He is insisting that the transit commission placed much thought on the routes. The cuts were based on cost effectiveness of service. The pension issue is of great importance and that money has been already been spent on printing of new schedule.
Titus insists that there is not really $5-million dollars extra. Insists that we have really good services, that citizens should be proud of.
Higgins makes a good closing point that perhaps if more than one transit passenger was on the commission it could be more efficient. It could be better promoted, and that the larger percentage of users are renters and renters pay 2x the tax rate of regular residential.
Considering that East Saint John is getting hit the hardest. It is despicable that Councilor Court is taking such a hard line against the prosperity of transit. Councillor Court does not stand up for is own ward and should likely be cut come election time. Voting time it is a referral motion 8-2 in-favour. Titus and Sullivan against.
Remember that one time on the bus, when…? Share your mass transit stories.
One of my best memories on the bus was on an East bus headed to the mall on March 25th, 2004. I happened to run into my friend Tony, we were both heading to the mall. At this point I had my first batch of 25 names on the nomination papers. This was where Tony signed as the witness.
As soon as I got to the mall I instantly went to head back to the north end to file the papers. The first time 8 of my names were rejected as the people who signed were not actually registered to vote. Then the second time 45 minutes later I was 2 names short. Then 25 minutes later, I was officially on the ballot.
When it finally got approved, the first thing I did was to run to every media outlet that I could find and dropped off my Press Release.
Running for Mayor was one of the most interesting times of my life, and all the people and aspects of the community that you get exposed to is unreal.
Then six and a half weeks, and 448 votes later that part of my life was over. Thus leading the way for 2 days later when I left the province on my first vacation and train ride later.
And the travels continue…
This week I went to
But what is even more inexcusable is the state of the decorations in the Council chamber. I have attached a photo that demonstrates the three worst violations.
1. The Queen’s Photo
This item really bugged me most of the night it is not noticeable on TV or the web feed but the photos are crooked. In the chamber, it was the Philip photo that looked wrong but upon review in PhotoShop
2. The New Brunswick Flag
This one is not as noticeable as the others but the flag is a good decimeter down the shaft from the top making it lower than the other flags.
3. The Acadian Banner/Flag
In this case
Bonus: Flag Order
The flags are positioned incorrectly. They are positioned left to right: Union Jack, New Brunswick, Canada, Acadian. By official precedence with 4 flags the Canadian flag should be on the left, followed by the flag of a sovereign state (Union Jack), Provincial Flag in order of confederation (NB), then historical flags (Acadian). Then an optional second Canadian flag could be on the right.
So now that I have looked into the election a little harder, I am changing some of the options.
Mike Richardson- I’m not quite sure what it is but Mike seems to have a well thought out plan, no dirt and the just has a personality that one would pay attention to as mayor.
Councillor At Large:
Danny Jardine- I remember Danny from the last election he was one of those people that are deeply rooted in the social aspects of the community, like Donny Snook, that understands the poverty aspect of the city but is that enough, I’m adding this name to my shortlist because the list of candidates that I get to choose from is so pathetic, I think ward 4 might just have the worst turnout than any other part of this city.
Mark LeBlanc- A maybe
Rick Mantle- I think this one could make the council a little interesting.
Chris Titus- This one is a definite vote, many of my favourite memories of council involve this fellow, especially back in the Shirley days. I like that Chris is involved in the community not afraid to express new ideas, and knows the when a horse is being flogged too long.
Councillor Ward 4:
I don’t seem to think that any of these people would be beneficial at the moment on the council chamber, this is one of the reasons that I was so opposed to the entire ward system is that the east is the area where no one that matters seems to ever run.
District Education Council District 1
Sub District 9: No one is running
District Education Council District 8
Zone A: Acclaimed
At the beginning of the 2004-2005 season I had redesigned the Common Council coverage graphics. These were replaced in January of 2005 with the current standardized graphics. Here are the graphics used in the Fall of 2004.
The images above may not be reproduced on any site other than cefm.ca.
After hearing that Common Council is going to let us vote forÂ or against wards I thought I would point out my views. The problem with wards is that you force people to elect people based on where they live as opposed to whether or not the person is any good for the job. In addition there is no course in the system to correct this error. Although it does allow for people to run and get elected that do not have broad support, but it also hinders the election of people that might be good people. And in some cases if there is no good people running in a riding the people in that riding would have to “make do” with one of those.
We see it all the time inÂ Provincial and Federal governments some ridings end up with weak people all the time that end up being backbenchers and you never hear from them till next time there is an election.
UsingÂ Miramichi as an example here are the results from May 2004.
MIRAMICHI (source gnb.ca)
|Mayor / Maire|
|Arch C Pafford||M||852||Â||Â|
|Frank B. Trevors||M||2646||Â||Â|
|Councillor At Large/Conseiller(Ã¨re) GÃ©nÃ©ral|
|Paul W. Dawson||M||4264||E||inc./sort.|
|Bernard (Bunny) Dempsey||M||2030||Â||Â|
|Raymond J Desveaux||M||1288||Â||Â|
|Pat R. Diotte||M||2206||Â||Â|
|Peter L. Manderson||M||3113||E||Â|
|John (Jake) McLaughlin||M||3796||E||Â|
|Robert (Trapper) Newman||M||906||Â||Â|
|Terry F Whalen, Sr.||M||2050||Â||Â|
|Councillor Ward 1/Conseiller(Ã¨re) Quartier 1|
|Councillor Ward 2/Conseiller(Ã¨re) Quartier 2|
|Ned E.J. Manderson||M||550||E||inc./sort.|
|Esther (Es) Nye||F||79||Â||Â|
|Councillor Ward 3/Conseiller(Ã¨re) Quartier 3|
|Councillor Ward 4/Conseiller(Ã¨re) Quartier 4|
|Wendy M Chadwick||F||377||E||inc./sort.|
|Allison J Furlotte||M||276||Â||Â|
|Carmel Elizabeth Hambrook||F||300||Â||Â|
|Councillor Ward 5/Conseiller(Ã¨re) Quartier 5|
|Councillor Ward 6/Conseiller(Ã¨re) Quartier 6|
|Scotty H. Bernard||M||accl.||E||inc./sort.|
|Councillor Ward 7/Conseiller(Ã¨re) Quartier 7|
|Peter J Malley||M||474||Â||Â|
|Martin J. McIntyre||M||614||E||inc./sort.|
|Councillor Ward 8/Conseiller(Ã¨re) Quartier 8|
|Brian J. King||M||accl.||E||inc./sort.|
Assuming that all wards are pretty equal in population Ward 4 there really wasn’t that many that voted and no one really got more votes than the other, this is an example as a “weak” ward. Where as Wards 2 and 5Â had very strong candidates and the second place candidate was more popular than the people elected in number 4.
This system is not good enough. Here is the system I think would work if wards were to work. For Saint John to haveÂ 6 Wards and 4 “at large” and all candidates will run for their ward. On the ballot you will have the candidates residing in your ward on the top for you to choose 1. And and option “I choose to not have any of the above candidates”. And is that option is the majority then that seat is added to the at large pool. This would protect from unwanted people being acclaimed/elected. Then the rest of the candidates from other wards would be listed for you to choose up to 4 people. If the person is the top in their ward, then they would become elected. Then all the votes will be combined city wide for the top 4 (or more to total 10 councillorsÂ if a ward was not elected) people that were elected “at large” that did not win their own ward. And the person city wide that receives the most votes becomes Deputy Mayor.