Comments on: Good Bye, Facebook! http://cefm.ca/2009/02/good-bye-facebook/ My personal spot on the web. Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:36:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20825 By: Charles F-M http://cefm.ca/2009/02/good-bye-facebook/#comment-30154 Charles F-M Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:57:22 +0000 http://www.cefm.ca/?p=675#comment-30154 The only thing I used to use Facebook for was the Status feed but now I have twitter. Everything I share is here at CEFM.ca (Frees-Melvin.ca comes here too.) Nobody can make me go back. The only thing I used to use Facebook for was the Status feed but now I have twitter. Everything I share is here at CEFM.ca (Frees-Melvin.ca comes here too.)

Nobody can make me go back.

]]> By: Darren Anthony http://cefm.ca/2009/02/good-bye-facebook/#comment-30153 Darren Anthony Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:12:52 +0000 http://www.cefm.ca/?p=675#comment-30153 via "chrispirillo" on Twitter: Facebook Revises back to Original Terms LOL that doesn't surprise me the least bit. via "chrispirillo" on Twitter: Facebook Revises back to Original Terms LOL

that doesn't surprise me the least bit.

]]> By: Darren Anthony http://cefm.ca/2009/02/good-bye-facebook/#comment-30150 Darren Anthony Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:31:24 +0000 http://www.cefm.ca/?p=675#comment-30150 I have just read the new facebook terms and I do not understand how they can claim rights to content that is linked to. From what I can understand by this is that if I link to a website, facebook has rights to that content. I do not believe that such a claim can be possible. If I or someone links to copyrighted material(s), the rights to that content should still be 100% ofthe copyright holder. Therfore, I think that what facebook means by claiming rights to linked content means that they possess all rights to how it is used within the facebook environment. To think that someone could link to photos on my website on facebook would grant facebook rights to my copyrighted matterial is obserd. I must look into this matter to understand it further, as I currently do not think it makes sense. I have just read the new facebook terms and I do not understand how they can claim rights to content that is linked to. From what I can understand by this is that if I link to a website, facebook has rights to that content. I do not believe that such a claim can be possible. If I or someone links to copyrighted material(s), the rights to that content should still be 100% ofthe copyright holder. Therfore, I think that what facebook means by claiming rights to linked content means that they possess all rights to how it is used within the facebook environment.

To think that someone could link to photos on my website on facebook would grant facebook rights to my copyrighted matterial is obserd. I must look into this matter to understand it further, as I currently do not think it makes sense.

]]>